Rodriguez v. Woodburn
Plaintiff: Abram Henry Rodriguez and Chris Rodriguez
Defendant: Doug Woodburn
Case Number: 2:2022cv00237
Filed: December 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Matthew J Kacsmaryk
Referring Judge: Lee Ann Reno
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 FILING FEE ORDER granting #9 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Clerk to mail this order to the attention of the Inmate Trust Fund Department at the facility where the inmate resides. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno on 1/11/2023) (nht)
January 11, 2023 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:10. (Copy of Order also Mailed to Potter County) Wed Jan 11 13:45:02 CST 2023 (crt)
December 29, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Abram Henry Rodriguez. (awc)
December 29, 2022 Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Doug Woodburn filed by Abram Henry Rodriguez. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (awc)
December 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY: Abram Henry Rodriguez must address the following deficiency: (SEE ORDER FOR SPECIFICS.) Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 30 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno on 12/15/2022) (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint Form) (awc)
December 15, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Thu Dec 15 13:32:09 CST 2022 (crt)
December 14, 2022 Filing 6 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (Attachments: #1 General Order Concerning Litigation) (awc)
December 14, 2022 Filing 5 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Reno (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Reno). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (awc) Modified date filed on 12/14/2022 (awc).
December 14, 2022 Filing 4 Case electronically transferred in from District of Texas Eastern, Tyler Division; Case Number 6:22-cv-00461. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas should seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Copy of NEF to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed.
December 14, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5,6. (Copy of NEF showing transfer of case to Amarillo also mailed to plaintiff.) Wed Dec 14 10:13:43 CST 2022 (crt)
December 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER OF TRANSFER re #1 Complaint filed by Abram Henry Rodriguez. ORDERED that the Plaintiffs civil rights lawsuit is TRANSFERRED to the Northern District of Texas, Amarillo Division. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 12/12/2022. (gsm) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 12/14/2022.]
December 6, 2022 Filing 2 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Love (gsm) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 12/14/2022.]
December 6, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Doug Woodburn, filed by Abram Henry Rodriguez.(gsm) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 12/14/2022.]
December 6, 2022 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (gsm) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 12/14/2022.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodriguez v. Woodburn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Abram Henry Rodriguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chris Rodriguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doug Woodburn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?