Freedom Coalition of Doctors for Choice v. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Freedom Coalition of Doctors for Choice |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
2:2023cv00009 |
January 13, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Matthew J Kacsmaryk |
Other Statutes: Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Summons issued as to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (awc) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (No magistrate judge assigned). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (awc) |
Filing 2 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing (Filing fee $100; Receipt number ATXNDC-13442135) filed by Freedom Coalition of Doctors for Choice (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibit - Ohio Cert, #2 Exhibit(s) Exhibit - KY Cert, #3 Exhibit(s) Exhibit - admissions, #4 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A, #5 Proposed Order Proposed Order)Attorney Christopher D Wiest added to party Freedom Coalition of Doctors for Choice(pty:pla) (Wiest, Christopher) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Centers for Disease Control and Prevention filed by Freedom Coalition of Doctors for Choice. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number ATXNDC-13441886) Clerk to issue summons(es) for federal defendant(s). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Sullivan, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Freedom Coalition of Doctors for Choice v. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Freedom Coalition of Doctors for Choice | |
Represented By: | John Clay Sullivan |
Represented By: | Christopher D Wiest |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention | |
Represented By: | Jody Dale Lowenstein |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.