Lessner et al v. Abbott et al
| Audrey Lessner and Anthony William Lessner Sr |
| Greg Abbott, Randall County, Northwest Texas Healthcare System and Jennings Counseling Services |
| 2:2023cv00099 |
| June 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Matthew J Kacsmaryk |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER: On June 12, 2023, this case was transferred from the Southern District of Texas to this Court. ECF No. 3. The Magistrate Judge noted that "Plaintiff previously attempted to bring a similar case in the Amarillo Division and it was summarily dismissed." Id at 1 (citing Lessner v. Tex. Dep. of Fam. & Prot. Servs. ("Lessner"), No. 2:20-CV-293-Z, ECF No. 13 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 24, 2021 )) (the "Dismissal Order"). Lessner was dismissed because it amounted to "a collateral attack on a state court judgment," which is precluded under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. Dismissal Order at 3. Here, Plaintiff's complaint is identical to the one the Court dismissed in Lessner. Compare ECF No. 1-1 with Lessner, No. 2:20-CV-293-Z, ECF No. 3. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that this case be DISMISSED for the same reasons as stated in the Court's Dismissal Order. See FED. R. CIV. P. 12(h)(3). (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 7/11/2023) (awc)
|
| Filing 6 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (nht) |
| Filing 5 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (No magistrate judge assigned). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (nht) |
| Filing 4 Case electronically transferred in from District of Texas Southern, Corpus Christi Division; Case Number 2:23-cv-00150. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas should seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Copy of NEF to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed. |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5, 6. (Copy of NEF of doc 4 also mailed) Tue Jun 13 14:44:42 CDT 2023 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5, 6. (Copy of NEF of doc 4 also mailed) Tue Jun 13 14:44:36 CDT 2023 (crt) |
|
Filing 3
OPINION AND ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE to Northern District of Texas, Amarillo Division. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Jason B Libby) Parties notified.(vrios, 2) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 6/13/2023.]
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER OF REFERENCE(Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(NeldaGarcia, 2) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 6/13/2023.]
|
| Interdistrict transfer to Northern District of Texas, Amarillo Division. Case transferred electronically. Case terminated on 6/12/23, filed. (vrios, 2) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 6/13/2023.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Audrey Lessner.(Complaint not signed by plaintiff) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(SashaOzuna, 2) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 6/13/2023.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
