High Plains Harvesting, LLC v. Deere & Company d/b/a John Deere
Plaintiff: High Plains Harvesting, LLC
Defendant: Deere & Company d/b/a John Deere and Deere & Company doing business as John Deere
Case Number: 2:2023cv00191
Filed: November 27, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: D Gordon Bryant
Referring Judge: Matthew J Kacsmaryk
Nature of Suit: Torts/Pers Prop: Property Damage Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 13 REPLY filed by Deere & Company re: #5 MOTION to Dismiss (Russell, Deondrey)
January 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by High Plains Harvesting, LLC re: #5 MOTION to Dismiss. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Report from Integrity - Design Defect) (Hind, Hobart) Modified linkage on 1/10/2024 (nht).
December 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER TO SUBMIT JOINT PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER: Joint Proposed Scheduling Order due by 1/26/2024. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge D. Gordon Bryant, Jr on 12/27/2023) (cmk)
December 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion to Extend Time to File Response/Reply. It is ORDERED that High Plains shall file its response brief no later than Monday, January 8, 2024. If John Deere so chooses, it may file a reply brief by Monday, January 22, 2024, in accordance with Local Civil Rule 7.1. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge D. Gordon Bryant, Jr on 12/20/2023) (awc)
December 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to #5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by High Plains Harvesting, LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Hind, Hobart)
December 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Court Request for Recusal: Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno recused. Therefore, via the direction of Judge Matthew J Kacsmaryk, Magistrate Judge D Gordon Bryant, Jr has been selected for matters that may have been referred. The Clerk has reassigned the case to Magistrate Judge D. Gordon Bryant, Jr for all further proceedings. Future filings should indicate the case number as: 2:23-CV-191-Z-BQ. (djs)
December 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STANDING ORDER OF REFERENCE to Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 12/15/2023) (nht)
December 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Certificate Regarding Judge-Specific Requirements. (Zinnecker, Ben)
December 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Deere & Company (Blackerby, Chris)
December 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Timothy C Williams on behalf of Deere & Company. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Williams, Timothy)
November 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (No magistrate judge assigned). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (cmk)
November 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deere & Company d/b/a John Deere. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Russell, Deondrey)
November 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Deere & Company d/b/a John Deere. (Filing fee $402; receipt number ATXNDC-14197998) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s) 1, #3 Exhibit(s) 2, #4 Exhibit(s) 3, #5 Exhibit(s) 4, #6 Exhibit(s) 5, #7 Exhibit(s) 6, #8 Exhibit(s) 7) (Blackerby, Chris)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: High Plains Harvesting, LLC v. Deere & Company d/b/a John Deere
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: High Plains Harvesting, LLC
Represented By: Hobart Martel Hind
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deere & Company d/b/a John Deere
Represented By: Chris Allen Blackerby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deere & Company doing business as John Deere
Represented By: Chris Allen Blackerby
Represented By: Ben T Zinnecker
Represented By: Deondrey Russell
Represented By: Timothy C Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?