Trieu, LLC v. Nguyen et al
| Trieu, LLC |
| Phuc C. Nguyen, Thanh Mai Do and Venetian Nail Spa LLC |
| Venetian Nails & Hair Inc. |
| 2:2024cv00087 |
| April 29, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Matthew J Kacsmaryk |
| Lee Ann Reno |
| Property Rights: Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #2 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Sean Michael Sharp. Important Reminder: Unless excused for cause, an attorney who is not an ECF user must register within 14 days of the date the attorney appears in a case pursuant to LR 5.1(f) and LCrR 49.2(g).; granting #3 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Serah Mary James. Important Reminder: Unless excused for cause, an attorney who is not an ECF user must register within 14 days of the date the attorney appears in a case pursuant to LR 5.1(f) and LCrR 49.2(g). (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 5/6/2024) (awc)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Mon May 6 14:40:51 CDT 2024 (crt) |
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER OF REFERENCE to Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 5/2/2024) (nht)
|
| Filing 6 Report to Patent/Trademark Office of Initiating Document. Form AO 120 e-mailed to [email protected]. (cmk) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (cmk) |
| Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (No magistrate judge assigned). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (cmk) |
| Filing 3 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing for Attorney Serah Mary James (Filing fee $100; Receipt number ATXNDC-14577715) filed by Trieu, LLC (Attachments: #1 Letter of Good Standing) (Stewart, Christian) (Main Document 3 replaced with flattened image on 4/30/2024) (cmk). Modified payment information on 5/6/2024 (awc). |
| Filing 2 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing for Attorney Sean Michael Sharp (Filing fee $100; Receipt number ATXNDC-14577680) filed by Trieu, LLC (Attachments: #1 Letter of Good Standing) (Stewart, Christian) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Phuc C. Nguyen, Thanh Mai Do, Venetian Nail Spa LLC, Venetian Nails & Hair Inc. filed by Trieu, LLC. (Filing fee $405; Receipt number ATXNDC-14577574) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Certificate of Interested Persons) (Stewart, Christian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
