Jones v. Potter County Detention Center
| Dustin Lee Jones |
| Potter County Detention Center |
| 2:2024cv00212 |
| September 27, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Matthew J Kacsmaryk |
| Lee Ann Reno |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
NOTICE of future address change filed by Dustin Lee Jones. (cmk)
|
Filing 7
QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Dustin Lee Jones re: #6 BRIEFING ORDER (nht)
|
Filing 6
BRIEFING ORDER: Plaintiff shall have until November 4, 2024, to complete the enclosed questionnaire and return it to the Clerk of the Court for filing in the record of this cause. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno on 10/4/2024) (cmk)
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Fri Oct 4 15:27:16 CDT 2024 (crt)
|
Filing 5
FILING FEE ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Clerk note: TDCJ Inmate Trust Office has been electronically notified of this order.) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno on 10/1/2024) (cmk)
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Tue Oct 1 15:07:33 CDT 2024 (crt)
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Dustin Lee Jones (nht)
|
Filing 3
COMPLAINT against Potter County Detention Center filed by Dustin Lee Jones. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (nht)
|
Filing 2
Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (Attachments: #1 General Order Concerning Litigation) (nht)
|
Filing 1
New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Reno (see Special Order 3). No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Reno). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (nht)
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. (Copy of 1st page of Complaint also mailed to Plaintiff) Fri Sep 27 11:06:58 CDT 2024 (crt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jones v. Potter County Detention Center | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Potter County Detention Center | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dustin Lee Jones | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.