Jones v. CBS Broadcasting Inc et al
| Patricia Jones |
| CBS Broadcasting Inc and CBS Interactive Inc |
| 2:2025cv00173 |
| August 1, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Matthew J Kacsmaryk |
| Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Mail returned as undeliverable. #10 Order on Motion for Leave to File received back from Patricia Jones as Not Deliverable as Addressed, Return to Sender Not At This Address. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (ars) |
Filing 10
ORDER denying #9 Motion for Leave to File. (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 10/3/2025) (ars)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:10. Fri Oct 3 16:02:18 CDT 2025 (crt) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to File Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis filed by Patricia Jones. Sent copy of file stamped motion in SASE. (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs) (ars) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Mon Sep 29 08:05:18 CDT 2025 (crt) |
|
Filing 8
Order Dismissing Case. (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 9/26/2025) (vls)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Plaintiff is ORDERED to pay the filing and administrative fees on or before Friday, September 26, 2025. Failure to do so will subject this case to dismissal without prejudice for failure to comply with a Court order and for lack of prosecution under Rule 41(b). (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 9/15/2025) (ars)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Mon Sep 15 15:59:02 CDT 2025 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Mon Aug 25 08:30:20 CDT 2025 (crt) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER denying #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 8/22/2025) (ars)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Patricia Jones. (ars) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Patricia Jones. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (ars) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Patricia Jones. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (ars) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (ars) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (No magistrate judge assigned). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ars) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. (Copy of first page of file-marked complaint also mailed) Fri Aug 1 10:33:02 CDT 2025 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
