Yashar'el v. City of Amarillo
| George Yashar'el |
| City of Amarillo |
| 2:2025cv00184 |
| August 12, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Matthew J Kacsmaryk |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
JUDGMENT: Plaintiff's Complaint is sua sponte DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2)(B). Judgment is rendered accordingly. (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 8/20/2025) (nht)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2)(B). All other pending motions are DENIED as moot. (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 8/20/2025) (nht)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7, 8. Wed Aug 20 14:58:59 CDT 2025 (crt) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Immediate Commercial Garnishment, Asset Seizure, and Enforcement of Public Judgment filed by George Yashar'el. (nht) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by George Yashar'el (nht) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by George Yashar'el. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (nht) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against City of Amarillo filed by George Yashar'el. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (nht) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/12/2025: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Proposed Summons) (nht). |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (nht) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (No magistrate judge assigned). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (nht) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. (Copy of 1st page of Complaint also mailed to Plaintiff) Tue Aug 12 10:34:13 CDT 2025 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Yashar'el v. City of Amarillo | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: George Yashar'el | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Amarillo | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
