McGuire v. Trump et al
| Curtis James McGuire |
| Donald Trump, U.S. Police Department, U.S. Government, Director of the F.B.I., Director of the C.I.A., U.S. Marshalls and U.S. Military |
| 2:2025cv00201 |
| September 4, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Matthew J Kacsmaryk |
| Lee Ann Reno |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 26
Request for Copy of document by Curtis James McGuire. (Attachments: #1 Clerk's Response Letter) (ars)
|
|
Filing 25
Request for Copy of copy of document by Curtis James McGuire. (Mailed back SASE). (Attachments: #1 Clerk's Response Letter) (ars)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:25. Tue Dec 30 14:52:43 CST 2025 (crt)
|
|
Filing 24
Request for Copy by Curtis James McGuire. (Attachments: #1 Clerk's Response Letter) (nht)
|
|
Filing 23
ORDER denying #22 OBJECTION to #12 Findings and Recommendations by Curtis James McGuire. (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 11/14/2025) (ars)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:23. Fri Nov 14 14:06:01 CST 2025 (crt)
|
|
Filing 22
OBJECTION to #12 Findings and Recommendations by Curtis James McGuire. (ars) Modified Event Type on 11/14/2025 (ars).
|
|
Filing 21
Case Paperwork filed by Curtis James McGuire. (ars)
|
|
Filing 20
JUDGMENT: The Court has entered its order ADOPTING the FCR of the United States Magistrate Judge in this case. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and Plaintiff is hereby issued a strike within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(g). (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 10/23/2025) (nht)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION re: #12 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: #3 Complaint, filed by Curtis James McGuire. (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 10/23/2025) (nht)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:19, 20. Thu Oct 23 15:18:46 CDT 2025 (crt)
|
|
Filing 18
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Curtis James McGuire. (ars)
|
|
Filing 17
Case Paperwork filed by Curtis James McGuire. (ars)
|
|
Filing 16
OBJECTION filed by Curtis James McGuire re: #12 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: #3 Complaint, filed by Curtis James McGuire. (Attachments: #1 Attachment) (ars)
|
|
Filing 15
Case Paperwork filed by Curtis James McGuire. (ars)
|
|
Filing 14
Public correspondence received from Curtis James McGuire. The clerk has not responded. (ars)
|
|
Filing 13
Public correspondence received from Curtis James McGuire. The clerk has not responded. (Mailed first page of file-marked copy in SASE.) (ars) Modified typo on 10/2/2025 (awc).
|
|
Filing 12
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT: For the reasons stated above, the Magistrate Judge concludes that McGuire's claims should be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno on 9/30/2025) (cmk)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:12. Tue Sep 30 14:02:41 CDT 2025 (crt)
|
|
Filing 11
Public correspondence filed, deputy clerk response attached, received from Curtis James McGuire. (Attachments: #1 Clerk's Response Letter) (ars)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Curtis James McGuire. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Clerks Response Letter) (ars)
|
|
Filing 9
Public correspondence received from Curtis James McGuire. The clerk has not responded. (ars)
|
|
Filing 8
Public correspondence received from Curtis James McGuire. The clerk has not responded. (ars) (Main Document 8 replaced with initialed document on 9/29/2025) (ars).
|
|
Filing 7
Public correspondence received from Curtis James McGuire. The clerk has not responded. (nht)
|
|
Filing 6
Public correspondence received from Curtis James McGuire. The clerk has not responded. (nht)
|
|
Filing 5
Settlement Agreement filed by Curtis James McGuire (nht)
|
|
Filing 4
Public correspondence received from Curtis James McGuire. The clerk has not responded. (nht)
|
|
Filing 3
COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Curtis James McGuire. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s), #2 Additional Page(s), #3 Additional Page(s), #4 Additional Page(s), #5 Additional Page(s)) (nht)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (nht)
|
|
Filing 1
New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Reno (see Special Order 3). (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Reno). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (nht)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. (Copy of 1st page of Complaint also mailed to Plaintiff) Thu Sep 4 15:04:28 CDT 2025 (crt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
