Lamons v. Amarillo College
| Dorothy Michelle Lamons |
| Amarillo College |
| 2:2026cv00083 |
| April 20, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Matthew J Kacsmaryk |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Amarillo College. Waiver sent on 5/4/2026. (Timmons, Sean) |
| Filing 7 Certificate Regarding Judge-Specific Requirements. (Timmons, Sean) |
Filing 6
STANDING ORDERS: Failure to comply with these Standing Orders may result in adverse consequences, up to and including dismissal or entry of default judgment. (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 4/27/2026) (ars)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Granting #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Local Counsel filed by Dorothy Michelle Lamons. (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 4/24/2026) (ars)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Local Counsel filed by Dorothy Michelle Lamons (Timmons, Sean) Modified title on 4/22/2026 (awc). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Amarillo College. (awc) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (No magistrate judge assigned). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (awc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Amarillo College filed by Dorothy Michelle Lamons. (Filing fee $405; Receipt number ATXNDC-16374464) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Additional Page(s)) (Timmons, Sean) (Attachment 2 replaced with flattened document on 4/21/2026) (awc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lamons v. Amarillo College | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dorothy Michelle Lamons | |
| Represented By: | Sean Christopher Timmons |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Amarillo College | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
