Heath v. Thomas, et al
Billy Donnell Heath |
Duncan Thomas, Ann Prince, Richard NMN Bosworth, Mike Johnston, Janie Simpson and Teresa NMN Hawthorne |
3:1999cv02277 |
July 9, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Dallas Office |
Sidney A Fitzwater |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 151 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER modifying denial of plaintiff Billy Donnell Heath's request for reconsideration and declining to set a hearing on damages at this time. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 8/9/2019) (Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater) |
Filing 146 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying without prejudice 142 plaintiff Written Pleading re: 103 ORDER granting [95-1] motion for default judgment against defendant Teresa Hawthorne filed by Billy Donnell Heath; adopting in part 144 FINDINGS, CONC LUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court should construe Plaintiff Billy Donnell Heath's Plaintiff Written Pleading 142 as a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) and deny that motion; and ordering plaintiff to file a written response within 28 days. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 2/13/2019) (Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater) |
Filing 136 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Heath's 5/15/2009 135 motion for relief from judgment is denied. (Ordered by Chief Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 7/9/2009) (twd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.