Loghry et al v. Francisco et al
Case Number: 3:2006cv00554
Filed: March 29, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Dallas Office
Presiding Judge: Sam A Lindsay
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 12, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 134 Memorandum Opinion and Order re 119 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the foregoing reasons, the court defers ruling on Joint Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants Steve Francisco, Starsearch International, LLC, Lexxus International Inc, and N atural Health Trends Corp and Defendants' Objections to Plaintiff's Evidence in Support of Response to Motion for Summary Judgment. The court will revisit the motion and objections upon receipt of the parties' supplemental briefs and e vidence. The parties may file evidence under seal if it contains confidential settlement information. These briefs and accompanying evidence must be filed no later than 12/31/2008. The court also vacates the remaining deadlines in its 6/5/2008 scheduling order. The court will issue an amended scheduling order and reset the trial of this action, if necessary, after ruling on the motion for summary judgment. (See Order) (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 12/12/08) (skt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Loghry et al v. Francisco et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?