Rolls-Royce Corporation v. HEROS Inc et al
Rolls-Royce Corporation |
HEROS Inc, Heros Kajberouni and Hye-Tech Manufacturing LLC |
HEROS Inc, Heros Kajberouni and Hye-Tech Manufacturing LLC |
Rolls-Royce Corporation |
3:2007cv00739 |
April 26, 2007 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Dallas Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Jerry Buchmeyer |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 294 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 293 Motion to Dismiss filed by Rolls-Royce Corporation. The court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated July 29, 2010 260 is VACATED in its entirety. This civil action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The court shall retain ancillary and/or plenary jurisdiction to enforce the parties' obligations arising from the Confidential Settlement Agreement. (See Memorandum Opinion and Order for specifics.) (Ordered by Chief Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 3/30/2011) (Chief Judge Sidney A Fitzwater) |
Filing 277 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 266 Motion to Amend/Correct filed by Rolls-Royce Corporation. Plaintiff-counterdefendant's August 26, 2010 motion to alter or amend the court's July 29, 2010 memorandum opinion and order is denied. (Ordered by Chief Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 11/8/2010) (Chief Judge Sidney A Fitzwater) |
Filing 209 ORDER. (Ordered by Chief Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 1/14/2010) (dnc) Modified on 1/19/2010 (jrb). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.