Westrich-James v. Dallas Morning News LP et al
| Patricia Westrich-James |
| Dallas Morning News LP and Belo Corp |
| 3:2007cv01329 |
| August 1, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| A. Joe Fish |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Defendants' 61 motion for summary judgment is DENIED as to the ADA claims, DENIED as to the Texas Labor Code claims, GRANTED as to the Equal Pay Act claims, and GRANTED as to the ERISA claims. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 9/17/2012) (twd)
|
|
Filing
49
Memorandum Opinion and Order Granted 22 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint filed by Belo Corp, Dallas Morning News Inc. TDMN's motion to dismiss the breach of fiduciary duty claim against it is GRANTED, and this claim agains t TDMN is DISMISSED with prejudice. Westrich-James's breach of fiduciary duty claim against Belo, however, is DISMISSED without prejudice, and Westrich- James is hereby GRANTED leave to amend her complaint, within twenty days of this date, to replead, if she can, her claim for breach of fiduciary duty under ERISA with more particularity. (see order) (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 03/25/09) (lmp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
