Microsoft Corporation v. Dauben Inc Featured Case

Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation alleges that Defendant Dauben, Inc. d/b/a Texas International Property Associates infringed on Microsoft's trade and service marks by registering Internet domain names that are identical or confusingly similar to Microsoft's trademarks and service marks.

Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation
Defendant: Dauben Inc
Case Number: 3:2008cv00098
Filed: January 22, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Dallas Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Irma C Ramirez
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 10, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 15
SCHEDULING ORDER: Joinder of Parties due by 7/7/2008. Amended Pleadings due by 7/7/2008. Discovery due by 10/6/2008. Status Report due by 5/7/2008. Motions due by 11/3/2008. This case is set for trial on 3/2/2009 before Magistrate Judge Irma C Ramirez. Pretrial Materials due by 2/17/2009. Pretrial Order due by 2/17/2009. Pretrial Conference set for 2/27/2009 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Irma C Ramirez. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Irma C Ramirez on 4/10/2008) (axm)
April 8, 2008 Filing 14
CONSENT to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge by all parties and Order Reassigning Case. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Irma C Ramirez for all further proceedings. Judge Sam A Lindsay no longer assigned to case. (see order for specifics) (Signed by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 4/8/08) (klm)
April 7, 2008 Filing 12
Joint Status Report and Agreed Proposed Discovery Plan Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 26(f) by Microsoft Corporation, Dauben Inc. (Patton, John) Modified on 4/8/2008 (tln).
March 18, 2008 Filing 11
Application and Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice by Pallavi Mehta Wahi for Microsoft Corporation. (Signed by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 3/18/08) (klm)
March 6, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 9
ORDER REQUIRING ATTORNEY CONFERENCE AND STATUS REPORT. This conference shall take place no later than March 21, 2008. Status Report due by 4/7/2008. See order for other specifics. (Signed by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 3/6/08) (jrb)
March 3, 2008 Filing 8
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Dauben Inc. (Tucker, Gary)
January 28, 2008 Filing 6
Court Request for Recusal: Magistrate Judge Jeff Kaplan recused; Magistrate Judge Irma Ramirez randomly assigned if matters are later referred by the presiding judge. (lrl)
January 25, 2008 Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Dauben Inc ; served by delivery to registered agent on 1/23/2008. (npk)
January 24, 2008 Filing 4
Order Designating Case for ECF - see order for specifics. (svc)
January 22, 2008 Filing 3
Summons Issued as to Dauben Inc. (svc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Microsoft Corporation v. Dauben Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation
Represented By: John W Patton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dauben Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?