Plaintiff i.think inc. alleged that Defendants Minekey, Inc. and Delip Andra infringed on Plaintiff's service mark by using the iThink mark in connection with online opinion polls on Internet networking sites such as Facebook, MySpace, Hi5 and Friendster.
i.think inc |
Minekey Inc, Delip Andra and Internet Unlimited LLC |
3:2008cv00163 |
February 1, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Dallas Office |
Dallas |
Jorge A Solis |
Trademark |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark |
Plaintiff |
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 ORDER ON STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL. THIS MATTER having come before the Court upon the parties' Stipulation of Dismissal, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-styled action, Civil Action No. 3-08-CV- 0163-P, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Ordered by Judge Jorge A Solis on 10/17/08) (lmp) |
***Civil Case Terminated per document #38. (skt) |
Filing 38 STIPULATION of Dismissal by i.think inc. (Prudhomme, Jeffrey) Modified on 10/17/2008 (skt). |
Filing 37 Order for Scheduling Order Proposal: Proposed Scheduling Order due by 10/15/2008. (Signed by Judge Jorge A Solis on 9/9/2008) (axm) |
Filing 36 Defendant's Amended ANSWER to 32 Amended Complaint filed by Minekey Inc (Weinlein, Craig) |
Filing 35 ORDER ON NOTICE OF DISMISSAL. Delip Andra, and only Delip Andra, is dismissed without prejudice from this action, Civil Action No. 3-08-CV-0163-P. (see order) (Signed by Judge Jorge A Solis on 7/10/08) (tln) |
Filing 34 RESPONSE in Opposition filed by i.think inc re 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Prudhomme, Jeffrey) |
Filing 33 NOTICE of Dismissal filed by i.think inc (Prudhomme, Jeffrey) |
Filing 32 AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against all defendants filed by i.think inc. (Prudhomme, Jeffrey) |
Filing 31 ORDER granting 28 Unopposed Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint. [Counsel granted leave to file an amended pleading under LR 15.1 is reminded to electronically file the amended pleading within 3 days. See ECF Standing Designation Order.] (Signed by Judge Jorge A Solis on 7/2/2008) (axm) |
Filing 30 ORDER ON NOTICE OF DISMISSAL: THIS MATTER having come before the Court upon Plaintiff's Notice of Dismissal, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Internet Unlimited, LLC, and only Internet Unlimited, LLC, is dismissed without prejudice from the above-captioned case. (Signed by Judge Jorge A Solis on 07/01/08) (lmp) |
Filing 29 ORDER granting 26 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply filed by i.think inc re: 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Responses due by 7/11/2008. (Signed by Judge Jorge A Solis on 07/01/08) (lmp). |
Filing 28 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File an Amended Complaint filed by i.think inc (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Amended Complaint) (Prudhomme, Jeffrey) |
Filing 27 NOTICE of Dismissal of Defendant Internet Unlimited LLC filed by i.think inc (Prudhomme, Jeffrey) |
Filing 26 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply filed by i.think inc re: 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. (Prudhomme, Jeffrey) Modified on 7/1/2008 (axm). |
Filing 25 ORDER granting 24 Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendant Internet Unlimited LLC's and Delip Andra's Motions to Dismiss. Responses due by 6/30/2008. (Signed by Judge Jorge A Solis on 6/9/2008) (axm) |
Filing 24 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re: 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, 13 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State A Claim filed by i.think inc (Prudhomme, Jeffrey) |
Filing 23 ORDER granting 22 Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendant Internet Unlimited, LLC's and Delip Andra's Motions to Dismiss. Responses due by 6/9/2008. (Signed by Judge Jorge A Solis on 5/19/08) (klm) |
Filing 22 Unopposed MOTION for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendant Internet Unlimited's and Delip Andra's Motions to Dismiss filed by i.think inc.(Prudhomme, Jeffrey) Modified on 5/16/2008 (lmp). |
Filing 21 ORDER denying 6 Motion to Remand. (See Order for specifics) (Signed by Judge Jorge A Solis on 4/30/08) (skt) |
Filing 20 ORDER granting 19 Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendant Internet Unlimited, LLC's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Plaintiff i.think inc. is granted an enlargement of time until twenty days after this Court issues its order on the pending Motion to Remand. (Signed by Judge Jorge A Solis on 4/1/08) (klm) |
Filing 19 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 13 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State A Claim by i.think inc (Prudhomme, Jeffrey) |
Filing 18 ORDER granting 15 Motion for Leave to Dispense Without Local Counsel. (Signed by Judge Jorge A Solis on 03/19/08) (lmp) |
Filing 17 REPLY filed by i.think inc re 6 MOTION to Remand (Prudhomme, Jeffrey) |
Filing 16 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Internet Unlimited LLC. (O'Neil, Dave) |
Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION Dispense With Local Counsel by Internet Unlimited LLC (O'Neil, Dave) |
Filing 14 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Internet Unlimited LLC re 13 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State A Claim (Attachments: # 1 Appendix to Internet Unlimited's M to Dismiss) (O'Neil, Dave) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State A Claim by Internet Unlimited LLC with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (O'Neil, Dave) |
Filing 12 Appendix in Support filed by Minekey Inc, Delip Andra re 11 Response to Motion to Remand (Weinlein, Craig) |
Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Minekey Inc, Delip Andra re 6 MOTION to Remand and Supporting Brief (Weinlein, Craig) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting 9 Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendant Andra's Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff i.think inc. is granted an enlargement of time until twenty days after this Court issues its order on the pending Motion to Remand. (Signed by Judge Jorge A Solis on 2/25/08) (klm) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendant Andra's Motion to Dismiss by i.think inc (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Order granting unopposed motion for enlargement of time to respond to motion to dismiss) (Franklin, Talcott) Modified on 2/22/2008 (tln). |
Filing 8 Original ANSWER to Complaint by Minekey Inc (Weinlein, Craig) |
Filing 7 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by i.think inc re 6 MOTION to Remand (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Appendix, # 2 Exhibit Compendium, # 3 Text of Proposed Order) (Franklin, Talcott) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Remand by i.think inc with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Franklin, Talcott) |
Filing 5 Appendix in Support filed by Delip Andra re 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Weinlein, Craig) Modified on 2/13/2008 (tln). |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Delip Andra with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Weinlein, Craig) |
Filing 3 Standing Order Designating Case for ECF - see order for specifics. (Signed by Judge Jorge A Solis on 2/4/2008) (axm) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Minekey Inc, Delip Andra. (axm) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 160th Judicial District Court of Dallas County TX, case number 08-01055 filed by Minekey Inc, Delip Andra. (Filing fee $ 350; receipt number 18866) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet, # 3 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet) (axm) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by i.think inc. (demanded in state court, see doc 1 for image) (axm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.