Kelly vs Capitol One Auto Finance
Plaintiff: Lola Kelly
Defendant: Capitol One Auto Finance Inc
Case Number: 3:2008cv00266
Filed: February 14, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Collin
Presiding Judge: Maryland Unassigned
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 22 Memorandum Opinion and Order Denying 18 Motion to Join Earnest Escamilla as a Defendant filed by Lola Kelly. (see order) (Ordered by Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 10/15/08) (lmp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kelly vs Capitol One Auto Finance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lola Kelly
Represented By: Maisha K Ballard Stroud
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Capitol One Auto Finance Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?