Cortez v. Raytheon Company
Plaintiff: Ann Cortez
Defendant: Raytheon Company
Case Number: 3:2008cv00801
Filed: May 12, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: Ed Kinkeade
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 62 Memorandum Opinion and Order denying as moot 57 MOTION for Leave to File Sur-Reply Opposing Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, granting 45 Motion for Summary Judgment. (See Order.) (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 10/1/09) (twd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cortez v. Raytheon Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ann Cortez
Represented By: Karen G Shropshire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Raytheon Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?