Cortez v. Raytheon Company
Ann Cortez |
Raytheon Company |
3:2008cv00801 |
May 12, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
Dallas |
Ed Kinkeade |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 62 Memorandum Opinion and Order denying as moot 57 MOTION for Leave to File Sur-Reply Opposing Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, granting 45 Motion for Summary Judgment. (See Order.) (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 10/1/09) (twd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cortez v. Raytheon Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ann Cortez | |
Represented By: | Karen G Shropshire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Raytheon Company | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.