Broderick et al v. Chapman et al
| M Elizabeth Broderick, Maria Joanna Pimentel, Lauren Olivia Tyler, Donna Marie Goossens, Gloria Mitchell, Carolyn Joan Patrick, Rachel Long, Angela Marie Chavez, Susan Weedon, Delia McClintock Lujan, Debrah Handley, Rose Mary Pino, Lily Schmidt, Debra Snodgrass, Brenda Kay Bloomer, Bivian Kathryn Brumley, Dorothy Henderson, Beverly Marty and Barbara Ann Kavigne |
| W. Elaine Chapman, John McBryde, Terry Means, Richard B Roper, III, Richard B Vance, J Michael Worley, Karen Mitchell, Randy Ely, Randy Moon, David Davidson, Paine Webber and John Does 1-10 |
| 3:2008cv01075 |
| June 25, 2008 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Tarrant |
| Sam A Lindsay |
| Paul D Stickney |
| Plaintiff |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
ORDER ACCEPTING 71 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The court transfers this case to the Fort Worth Division of the Northern District of Texas. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 3/27/2009) (twd)
|
|
Filing
71
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE on case: The Court recommends that this case be transferred to the Fort Worth Division of the Northern District of Texas. Magistrate Judge Paul D Stickney no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Paul D Stickney on 3/12/2009) (twd)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER: The court determines that the 41 findings and conclusions are correct in part, and are therefore accepted in part. Accordingly, the court dismisses without prejudice all claims brought by any Plaintiff except for Broderick. Because Broderi ck initially filed this action and has paid the filing fee, her claims may go forward. Broderick, however, is directed to file an amended pleading no later than 12/15/2008 setting forth the claims that she brings on her behalf. Failure to file an ame nded pleading by this date will subject Plaintiff's action to dismissal for want of prosecution or failure to comply with a court order. Every other Plaintiff must file his or her own individual complaint with the court and pay the filing fee of $350. (All pending motions termed. See Order for specifics.) (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 11/14/2008) (twd)
|
|
Filing
41
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE on case: The Court recommends that this complaint be dismissed without prejudice and the clerk of court be directed to open new civil actions for each of the named Plainti ffs. Each Plaintiff should be required to file a separate complaint asserting her individual claims and pay the $350 filing fee, or file a proper request to proceed in forma pauperis. Additionally, all pending motions should be denied without prejudice. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul D Stickney on 9/23/2008) (twd)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER: The court overrules as moot each of Plaintiffs' objections and determines the transfer of this case is unwarranted. The court determines that the findings and conclusions are incorrect and are rejected. The court, having decided not to transfer this case, denies Plaintiff Broderick's 30 request for a hearing. The court denies as moot her 30 request for a thirty-day stay because there is no scheduling order in this case, and Plaintiff has ample time to obtain counsel to appear on her behalf and others. (Signed by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 9/4/2008) (twd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
