Devices Inc v. Senior Operations Inc
Plaintiff: Devices Inc
Defendant: Senior Operations Inc
Case Number: 3:2008cv01264
Filed: July 24, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: Reed C O'Connor
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 41 Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 35 Motion for Attorney Fees filed by Devices Inc. Plaintiff shall recover from defendant $26,952.00 in attorney's fees as the prevailing party in this litigation. (see order) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeff Kaplan on 12/29/2009) (axm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Devices Inc v. Senior Operations Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Devices Inc
Represented By: Anne P Stark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Senior Operations Inc
Represented By: J Robert White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?