Nassar v. UT Southwestern Health Systems et al
| Naiel Nassar |
| UT Southwestern Health Systems, Parkland Health & Hospital System, Beth Levine and J Gregory Fitz |
| 3:2008cv01337 |
| August 4, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| A. Joe Fish |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
194
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 178 Motion to Alter Judgment (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 11/3/2010) (Judge Jane J Boyle)
|
|
Filing
175
ORDER denying 147 Motion For An Award of Front Pay. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 9/16/2010) (Judge Jane J Boyle)
|
|
Filing
160
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting in part and denying in part 146 Motion for Attorney Fees filed by Naiel Nassar. See Order (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 7/27/2010) (svc)
|
|
Filing
100
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 49 Defendant Parkland Health & Hospital Syatem's Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court finds that Plaintiff Nassar has failed to establish a prima facie case of retaliation against Parkland. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 2/19/2010) (Judge Jane J Boyle) .
|
|
Filing
71
Memorandum Order denying 62 Defendant Parkland Health & Hospital System's Motion for Leave to File Appendix in Support of Reply. (see order) (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 9/1/2009) (klm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
