Muhammad v. Newell et al
| Herbert Ameen Muhammad |
| NFN Newell and City of Terrell, TX |
| 3:2008cv01426 |
| August 14, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Dallas |
| Jeff Kaplan |
| Barbara M. G. Lynn |
| Defendant |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
Memorandum Order denying 72 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Herbert Ameen Muhammad. (See Order) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeff Kaplan on 4/27/2010) (skt)
|
|
Filing
69
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 54 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by W.K. Newell, City of Terrell, TX. (see order) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeff Kaplan on 08/12/09) (lmp)
|
|
Filing
53
Memorandum Order granting 47 Motion to Dismiss filed by W.K. Newell, City of Terrell, TX. The claims against Newell in his official capacity are dismissed as redundant. (see order) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeff Kaplan on 3/4/09) (klm)
|
|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM ORDER: Defendants' motion to dismiss is denied, but their request for a more definite statement and a Rule 7(a) reply is granted. [Doc. # 24 ]. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint and a Rule 7(a) reply by November 14. 2008. Defendants' motion for protective order [Doc, # 26 ] is granted. All discovery is stayed pending further order of the court. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeff Kaplan on 10/14/2008) (mfw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
