Adedipe v. Countrywide Home Loans/BOFA
Plaintiff: Anthony A Adedipe
Defendant: Countrywide Home Loans/BOFA
Case Number: 3:2008cv01662
Filed: September 19, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: Wm F Sanderson
Presiding Judge: Ed Kinkeade
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Memorandum Order denying 1 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Plaintiff may reurge his motion if this case survives dismissal after dispositive motions are decided. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeff Kaplan on 10/17/2008) (mfw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adedipe v. Countrywide Home Loans/BOFA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Countrywide Home Loans/BOFA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony A Adedipe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?