Cunningham v. Advanta Corp. et al
Plaintiff: Craig Cunningham
Defendant: Advanta Corp., Dennis Alter, John F Moore, William Rosoff, Philip Browne, David Weinstock and Gary Moderim
Case Number: 3:2008cv01794
Filed: October 8, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: Ed Kinkeade
Presiding Judge: Irma C Ramirez
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER ADOPTING 30 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Plaintiff's 14 Motion to Remand is DENIED. Defendant's 6 Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff' ;s claims arising under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Texas Finance Code, and the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act against Defendants Advanta Corp., Dennis Alter, John Moore, Phillip Browne, David Weinstock, and William Rosoff are DISMISSED with prejudice. This case is returned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Irma C. Ramirez for further pretrial management. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 2/3/2009) (mfw)
January 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 30 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Plaintiff's objection to the affidavit as it pertains to the activities of Advanta Bank Corp. is OVERRULED, and his motion to strike is DENIED. Defendant Advanta's objections to Plaintiff's E xhibits A, B, C, and D are SUSTAINED and the motion to strike these four exhibits is GRANTED. The Court recommends that Defendant Officers' motion to the dismiss be GRANTED as to the claims arising under the TCPA and FDCPA. Plaintiff has failed to state a claim for which relief can be granted. His state law claims arising under the Texas Finance Code and the DTPA against Defendant Advanta and Defendant Officers should be DISMISSED with prejudice. The Court recommends that Plaintiff's M otion to Remand be DENIED and Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED.Claims against Defendant Advanta and Defendant Officers arising under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Texas Finance Code, and the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act should be DISMISSED with prejudice. (See ORDER for other specifics) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma C Ramirez on 1/14/2009) (mfw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cunningham v. Advanta Corp. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Craig Cunningham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Advanta Corp.
Represented By: Michael L Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dennis Alter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John F Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Rosoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Philip Browne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Weinstock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gary Moderim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?