Dymatize Enterprises Inc v. Maximum Human Performance Inc

Justia Dockets & Filings Fifth Circuit Texas Northern District Dymatize Enterprises Inc v. Maximum Human Performance Inc

Dymatize Enterprises Inc v. Maximum Human Performance Inc

Plaintiff:	Dymatize Enterprises Inc
Defendant:	Maximum Human Performance Inc
Case Number:	3:2009cv00046
Filed:	January 9, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office:	Trademark Office
County:	Dallas
Presiding Judge:	Reed C O'Connor
Nature of Suit:	Both
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:2201 Declaratory Judgment

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 14, 2011	Filing 141 ORDER: The Court finds that MHP's Motion for Instructions (ECF No. 133 ) should be and is hereby DENIED for lack of jurisdiction. Additionally, the Court finds that in light of the settlement agreement and subsequent orders by the Court, Dymatize's Second Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF NO. 61 ), and the corresponding Finding, Conclusions, and Recommendation (ECF No. 90 ) should be and are hereby DENIED as moot. (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 3/14/2011) (mfw)
November 17, 2010	Filing 131 ORDER ACCEPTING 126 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The parties are ORDERED to proceed to execute a settlement agreement and to file a stipulation of dismissal with the Court no later than 12/17/2010. (See Order) (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 11/17/2010) (dnc)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 14, 2011

Filing 141 ORDER: The Court finds that MHP's Motion for Instructions (ECF No. 133 ) should be and is hereby DENIED for lack of jurisdiction. Additionally, the Court finds that in light of the settlement agreement and subsequent orders by the Court, Dymatize's Second Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF NO. 61 ), and the corresponding Finding, Conclusions, and Recommendation (ECF No. 90 ) should be and are hereby DENIED as moot. (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 3/14/2011) (mfw)

November 17, 2010

Filing 131 ORDER ACCEPTING 126 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The parties are ORDERED to proceed to execute a settlement agreement and to file a stipulation of dismissal with the Court no later than 12/17/2010. (See Order) (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 11/17/2010) (dnc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dymatize Enterprises Inc v. Maximum Human Performance Inc
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dymatize Enterprises Inc
Represented By:	Amanda Kaye Jenkins
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Maximum Human Performance Inc
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?