Harris v. Blockbuster Inc Featured Case
Plaintiff: Cathryn Elaine Harris
Defendant: Blockbuster Inc
Case Number: 3:2009cv00217
Filed: February 3, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Other Statutory Actions Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: Barbara M. G. Lynn
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Fed. Question
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 49 MOTION to Withdraw 33 NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL filed by Blockbuster Inc. (twd)
December 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER denying 41 Plaintiffs' Motion to Lift Stay, Consolidate Proceedings, and to Enter Order to Show Cause. (see order) (Ordered by Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 12/7/2009) (tln)
November 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 46 Appendix in Support filed by Blockbuster Inc re 45 Response in Opposition (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8 (part 1 of 2), # 9 Exhibit 8 (part 2 of 2), # 10 Exhibit 9 (part 1 of 2), # 11 Exhibit 9 (part 2 of 2)) (Raiff, Michael)
November 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 45 RESPONSE in Opposition filed by Blockbuster Inc re 41 Plaintiffs' MOTION to Lift Stay, Consolidate Proceedings and to Enter Order to Show Cause (Raiff, Michael)
October 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 44 NOTICE of Transfer of the Appellate Record to USCA5. (jmr)
October 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 42 NOTICE of Filing Supplement re: 41 MOTION for Order to Show Cause MOTION Plaintiffs' Motion to Lift Stay, Consolidate Proceedings and to Enter Order to Show Cause filed by Cathryn Elaine Harris, Mario Herrera, Maryam Hosseiny (Wilson, Jeremy)
October 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 41 Plaintiffs' MOTION to Lift Stay, Consolidate Proceedings and MOTION for Order to Show Cause filed by Cathryn Elaine Harris, Mario Herrera, Maryam Hosseiny with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8) (Wilson, Jeremy)
August 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 40 NOTICE of Transfer of the Appellate Record to Cathryn Elaine Harris (jmr)
August 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 39 NOTICE of Receipt of the Appellate Record as to Blockbuster Inc (jmr)
May 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 38 NOTICE of Transfer of the Appellate Record to attorney for Blockbuster Inc re: 33 Notice of Appeal. (jmr)
May 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Record on Appeal Certified to US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit re 33 Notice of Appeal, - USCA5 Number: 09-10420. 1 vol. electronic record. (jmr)
May 5, 2009 Opinion or Order USCA5 Case Number 09-10420 for 33 Notice of Appeal filed by Blockbuster Inc. (klm)
May 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER granting 34 Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Appeal. The Court has considered the Plaintiffs' Response to the Motion, and concludes that regardless of whether staying the case is automatic or in the Court's discretion, the case should be stayed until the Fifth Circuit rules on Defendant's appeal. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 05/01/09) (lmp)
April 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 36 TRANSCRIPT NOT REQUESTED by Blockbuster Inc; Transcript is unnecessary for appeal purposes. (Raiff, Michael) Modified on 4/28/2009 (jmr).
April 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 35 RESPONSE filed by Cathryn Elaine Harris re 34 MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending Appeal and Brief in Support (Wilson, Jeremy)
April 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending Appeal filed by Blockbuster Inc with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Raiff, Michael)
April 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 33 NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL to the Fifth Circuit by Blockbuster Inc. Filing fee $455, receipt number 05390000000002693097. T.O. form to appellant electronically at Transcript Order Form or US Mail as appropriate. Copy of NOA to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed. (Raiff, Michael)
April 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 32 Memorandum Opinion. The Court concludes that the arbitration provision of the Blockbuster contract is illusory and unenforceable, and accordingly, Defendant's Motion to Compel Individual Arbitration is denied. (see order) (Ordered by Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 04/15/09) (lmp)
March 31, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER denying 15 Defendant's Motion to Compel Individual Arbitration. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 3/31/09) (tln)
February 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER: It is ORDERED that the above-captioned case is TRANSFERRED to the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division (see order) (Ordered by Judge David Folsom on 12/30/08) (tln)
February 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Case transferred in from District of Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division; Case Number 2:08cv155 (DF). Original file with certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. (tln)
December 17, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 29 REPLY to Response re: 27 Second MOTION to Change Venue filed by Blockbuster Inc. (tln)
December 10, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 28 RESPONSE in Opposition filed by Cathryn Elaine Harris, Mario Herrera, Maryam Hosseiny re 27 Second MOTION to Change Venue. (tln)
November 26, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 27 Second MOTION to Change Venue filed by Blockbuster Inc. (tln)
October 3, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 23 SUR-REPLY filed by Cathryn Elaine Harris, Mario Herrera, Maryam Hosseiny re 15 MOTION to Compel. (tln)
September 19, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 21 REPLY to Response re: 15 MOTION to Compel filed by Blockbuster Inc. (tln)
September 5, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 19 RESPONSE filed by Cathryn Elaine Harris, Mario Herrera, Maryam Hosseiny re 15 MOTION to Compel. (tln)
July 31, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 16 SCHEDULING ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/5/2009 before Judge David Folsom. Amended Pleadings due by 3/1/2009. Discovery due by 7/2/2009. Joinder of Parties due by 3/1/2009. Mediation Completion due by 8/3/2009. Dispositive Motions due by 8/3/2009. JOINT Proposed Pretrial Order due by 9/18/2009. Signed by Judge David Folsom on 7/31/2008. (tln)
July 30, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MOTION to Compel Individual Arbitration filed by Blockbuster Inc. (tln)
July 30, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 14 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (tln)
June 17, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Original ANSWER to 5 Amended Complaint filed by Blockbuster Inc (tln)
June 3, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT - CLASS ACTION against Blockbuster Inc filed by Cathryn Elaine Harris, Mario Herrera, Maryam Hosseiny.
April 9, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Original Complaint - Class Action against Blockbuster Inc filed by Cathryn Elaine Harris. (Filing fee $350; Receipt number 1496366) (tln)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harris v. Blockbuster Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cathryn Elaine Harris
Represented By: Jeremy R Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Blockbuster Inc
Represented By: Michael L Raiff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?