Acosta v. Fair Isaac Corporation
Plaintiff: Robert Acosta
Defendant: Fair Isaac Corporation
Case Number: 3:2009cv00378
Filed: February 27, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: Jane J Boyle
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 18 Memorandum Order granting 3 Motion to Compel and Dismisses Plaintiff's Claims with prejudice. The parties are directed to resolve their dispute through arbitration in accordance with their agreement. (See Order) (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 10/28/09) (skt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Acosta v. Fair Isaac Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Acosta
Represented By: Robert M Behrendt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fair Isaac Corporation
Represented By: Michael A Swartzendruber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?