United States of America v. Hand-Bostick et al
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Sally Hand-Bostick, Edward W. Adams, Timothy W. Adams and Elizabeth Spinelli
Case Number: 3:2009cv01075
Filed: June 9, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Dallas Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Sam A Lindsay
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 26 U.S.C. ยง 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 206 Memorandum Opinion and Order: After considering the totality of the circumstances in this case, the court concludes, for the reasons herein explained, that, while Defendants engaged in conduct subject to penalty under I.R.C. §§ 6700( a)(2)(A), 6700(a)(2)(B), 6694(a), and 6694(b)(2)(B), an injunction under sections 7407, 7408, or 7402(a) of the IRC is not necessary to prevent Defendants from engaging in the same or similar prohibited conduct or interfering with tax adminis tration or enforcement in the future. The court therefore denies the Government's request for injunctive relief under sections 7407, 7408, and 7402(a) of the IRC. Judgment will issue by separate document as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 10/8/2014) (jrr)
September 12, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 151 Memorandum Opinion and Order granting in part and denying in part 124 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 150 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Authority. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 9/12/2011) (axm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Hand-Bostick et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Shana Marie Starnes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sally Hand-Bostick
Represented By: Richard H Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edward W. Adams
Represented By: Richard H Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Timothy W. Adams
Represented By: Richard H Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Elizabeth Spinelli
Represented By: Richard H Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?