Sandusky vs. Cigna Healthcare, et al
| Weldon H Sandusky |
| Cigna Healthcare, Mega Life and Health Insurance Company, Star HRG and Connecticut General Life Insurance Company |
| 3:2009cv01626 |
| September 1, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| David C Godbey |
| Wm F Sanderson |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER ACCEPTING 14 SUPPLEMENTAL FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONOF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The Court ACCEPTS the Supplemental Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, DENIES as moot Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Doc. #10) (see order) (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 12/14/2009) (mfw)
|
|
Filing
14
SUPPLEMENTAL FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONOF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: It is recommended that Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Doc. #10) be DENIED as moot, that the first amended complaint (insofar as it requests an a ward of monetary damages in favor of doctors and health care providers) be DISMISSED sua sponte for lack of jurisdiction, and that Plaintiff be ORDERED to file a second amended complaint which alleges only claims for relief in his own personal behalf. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Wm F Sanderson, Jr on 12/1/2009) (mfw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
