Murphy et al v. Verizon Communications, Inc. et al
| Philip A Murphy, Jr, Sandra R Noe and Claire M Palmer |
| Verizon Communications Inc, Verizon Employee Benefits Committee, Verizon Pension Plan For New York and New England Associates, Verizon Management Pension Plan, Idearc Employee Benefits Committee, Idearc Pension Plan For Management Employees and Idearc Pension Plan For Collectively Bargained Employees |
| 3:2009cv02262 |
| November 25, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| A. Joe Fish |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A. |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
151
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Defendants' bill of costs (Docs. 140 and 142 ) are GRANTED. The Court assesses a total of $4,203.22 in costs against Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs shall pay $2,244.73 of this amount to Verizon and the balance of $1,958.49 to SuperMedia. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Paul D Stickney on 4/13/2015) (skt)
|
|
Filing
138
Memorandum Opinion and Order Granting 77 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Verizon Defendants and 80 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by SuperMedia Employee Benefits Committee and Denying; 81 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Philip A Murphy, Jr, Sandra R Noe, Claire M Palmer. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 9/16/2013) (cea)
|
|
Filing
33
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 18 Motion to Dismiss Fifth Claim for Relief filed by Verizon Employee Benefits Committee, Verizon Communications Inc; granting in part and denying in part 22 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Idearc Pension Plan For Management Employees, Idearc Pension Plan For Collectively Bargained Employees, Idearc Employee Benefits Committee. (see order) (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 10/18/2010) (tln)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
