Reyes et al v. North Texas Tollway Authority (NTTA) et al
| Mirna Reyes and Emmanuel Lewis |
| North Texas Tollway Authority (NTTA), Paul Wageman, Allen Clemson, Janice Davis, Kevin Williams and Clayton Howe |
| 3:2010cv00868 |
| April 30, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| A. Joe Fish |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
193
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The plaintiffs' 140 motion for partial summary judgment is DENIED, and the defendant's 145 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Judgment will be entered for the defendants. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 5/16/2016) (sss)
|
|
Filing
113
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 108 plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend proposed class definitions. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 8/19/2015) (ran)
|
|
Filing
83
Memorandum Opinion and Order: The defendant's 76 motion for summary judgment is DENIED as to the NTTA's reading of pre-amendment Texas Transportation Code § 366.178, DENIED as to the plaintiffs' substantive due process claim, and GRANTED as to the plaintiffs' procedural due process claim. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 6/12/2014) (axm)
|
|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 21 Motion to Dismiss, 20 Motion to Dismiss. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 11/14/2011) (skt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
