Cowart v. Erwin et al
| Mark A Cowart |
| FNU Erwin, John Doe 1-10 and Dallas County Jail |
| 3:2010cv01800 |
| September 10, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| A. Joe Fish |
| Jeff Kaplan |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
210
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 196 motion for judgment as a matter of law or, in the alternative, for a new trial. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 4/9/2015) (ctf)
|
|
Filing
110
Order Accepting 107 Findings and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 11/26/2013) (aaa)
|
|
Filing
97
Order Accepting 95 the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. Defendants' 86 MOTION for Summary Judgment is DENIED. This case is RECOMMITTED to Magistrate Judge David L. Horan for pretrialmanagement, including resolution of the factual disputes regarding defendants' PLRA exhaustion defense, including through an evidentiary hearing if necessary, as required by Fifth Circuit precedent. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 8/2/2013) (ykp)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER Accepting 5 Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 11/12/2010) (axm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
