NetVet Group v. Fagin
| NetVet Group |
| Scott Fagin |
| FDIC |
| 3:2010cv01934 |
| September 27, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| Sidney A Fitzwater |
| Other Fraud |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
Memorandum Opinion and Order re: 73 Defendant FDIC, as Receiver for Colonial Bank's, Second Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Brief in Support. Defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plainti ff's claim for exemplary damages is dismissed with prejudice, and its claims for breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, gross negligence, negligent misrepresentation, theft, conversion, and fraud remain pending. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 12/14/2011) (mcrd)
|
|
Filing
64
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 40 , 44 , 48 , 53 Defendants Motions to Dismiss; denying as moot Alternative Motions by FDIC and Fagin for more definite Statement. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint is GRANTED. Unless Plaintiff files an amended complaint within fourteen days of the entry of this order, all of its claims against Defendants will be dismissed with prejudice. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma C Ramirez on 7/1/2011) (axm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
