Oliver v. Brown et al
Norman Charles Oliver |
David Brown, Corporal Dallas Police Department and Dallas Police Officer |
3:2010cv02154 |
October 27, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Dallas Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Jane J Boyle |
Renee Harris Toliver |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 72 ORDER ACCEPTING 70 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Defendant Jonathan Proffitt's Motion for Summary Judgment on Qualified Immunity (Doc. 59 ) and Defendants James Lewis' and Josie Hertel's Motion for Summary Judgment on Qualified Immunity. (Doc. 62 ) are both GRANTED. Plaintiff's remaining claims against Defendants Proffitt, Lewis and Hertel are dismissed with prejudice as barred by the statute of limitations. The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 5/20/2013) (ctf) |
Filing 48 ORDER ACCEPTING 44 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 11/15/2012) (tln) |
Filing 15 ORDER ACCEPTING 10 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 1/6/2011) (dnc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.