Branch Banking & Trust Co., Successor in Interest to Colonial Bank, by Acquisition of Assets from the FDIC as Receiver for Colonial Bank v. Wells

Justia Dockets & Filings Fifth Circuit Texas Northern District Branch Banking & Trust Co., Successor in Interest to Colonial Bank, by Acquisition of Assets from the FDIC as Receiver for Colonial Bank v. Wells

Branch Banking & Trust Co., Successor in Interest to Colonial Bank, by Acquisition of Assets from the FDIC as Receiver for Colonial Bank v. Wells

Plaintiff:	Branch Banking & Trust Co., Successor in Interest to Colonial Bank, by Acquisition of Assets from the FDIC as Receiver for Colonial Bank
Defendant:	William K. Wells
Case Number:	3:2010cv02238
Filed:	November 4, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office:	Dallas Office
County:	Dallas
Presiding Judge:	Sam A Lindsay
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 28, 2014	Filing 49 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 30 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Branch Banking & Trust Co. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 1/28/2014) (skt)
July 5, 2013	Filing 47 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 46 MOTION for Final Summary Judgment Timely Filed or, in the alternative, 46 MOTION for Leave to File Untimely Motion for Final Summary Judgment: The court denies Plaintiff� 39;s 46 Motion to Consider Motion for Final Summary Judgment Timely Filed. Because the court determines that good cause exists to amend the scheduling order with respect to the dispositive motion deadline, it grants Plaintiff's 46 Motio n for Leave to file Untimely Motion for Final Summary Judgment. As Plaintiff's 30 Motion for Final Summary Judgment is already part of the record, it is deemed filed as of 7/05/2013. The court directs the clerk of court to amend the docke t sheet to reflect that Plaintiff's 30 Motion for Final Summary Judgment is deemed filed as of 7/05/2013. The court further directs Defendant to file its response to Plaintiff's summary judgment motion by 7/26/2013. Plaintiff's reply brief shall be filed by 8/6/2013. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 7/5/2013) (twd)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 28, 2014

Filing 49 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 30 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Branch Banking & Trust Co. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 1/28/2014) (skt)

July 5, 2013

Filing 47 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 46 MOTION for Final Summary Judgment Timely Filed or, in the alternative, 46 MOTION for Leave to File Untimely Motion for Final Summary Judgment: The court denies Plaintiff� 39;s 46 Motion to Consider Motion for Final Summary Judgment Timely Filed. Because the court determines that good cause exists to amend the scheduling order with respect to the dispositive motion deadline, it grants Plaintiff's 46 Motio n for Leave to file Untimely Motion for Final Summary Judgment. As Plaintiff's 30 Motion for Final Summary Judgment is already part of the record, it is deemed filed as of 7/05/2013. The court directs the clerk of court to amend the docke t sheet to reflect that Plaintiff's 30 Motion for Final Summary Judgment is deemed filed as of 7/05/2013. The court further directs Defendant to file its response to Plaintiff's summary judgment motion by 7/26/2013. Plaintiff's reply brief shall be filed by 8/6/2013. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 7/5/2013) (twd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Branch Banking & Trust Co., Successor in Interest to Colonial Bank, by Acquisition of Assets from the FDIC as Receiver for Colonial Bank v. Wells
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Branch Banking & Trust Co., Successor in Interest to Colonial Bank, by Acquisition of Assets from the FDIC as Receiver for Colonial Bank
Represented By:	Mark D Cronenwett
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: William K. Wells
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?