San Francisco Technology, Inc. v. Dexas International LTD
San Francisco Technology Inc |
Dexas International LTD |
3:2011cv00137 |
January 20, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Dallas Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Barbara M.G. Lynn |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 402 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT DEXAS INTERNATIONAL LTD.'S MOTION 214 TO SEVER AND TRANSFER VENUE. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on January 19, 2011. [Transferred from California Northern on 1/20/2011.] |
Filing 401 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT NEWELL RUBBERMAID INC.'S MOTION TO SEVER AND TRANSFER VENUE. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on January 14, 2011. [Transferred from California Northern on 1/20/2011.] |
Filing 393 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF OPTIMUM TECHNOLOGIES INC. re 391 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 1/3/11. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2011) [Transferred from California Northern on 1/20/2011.] |
Filing 390 AMENDED ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on December 3, 2010. [Transferred from California Northern on 1/20/2011.] |
Filing 345 ORDER GRANTING 341 , 344 DEFENDANT DEXAS INTERANTIONAL LTD'S REQUEST FOR COUNSEL TO PARTICIPATE IN INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND MOTION HEARING BY TELEPHONE. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 11/4/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2010) [Transferred from California Northern on 1/20/2011.] |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.