Bennigan's Franchising Company, LLC v. Team Irish Inc et al
Bennigan's Franchising Company, LLC |
Benn of Channelside Inc, James A. Tully, Mitchell J. Walker and Team Irish Inc |
3:2011cv00364 |
February 22, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Dallas Office |
Dallas |
Sidney A Fitzwater |
Franchise |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 55 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting June 2, 2011 motion for attorney's fees, as supplemented on September 27, 2011, and awarding $81,556.16 in attorney's fees. (Ordered by Chief Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 11/28/2011) (Chief Judge Sidney A Fitzwater) |
Filing 50 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and deferring in part 39 Motion for Attorney Fees filed by Bennigan's Franchising Company, LLC, and denying 43 Motion for Attorney Fees filed by Benn of Channelside Inc, James A. Tully, Team Iris h Inc, Mitchell J. Walker. The court grants the June 2, 2011 motion for attorney's fees and costs of Bennigan's to the extent of concluding that Bennigan's is entitled to recover the fees that it establishes are reasonable through its submission of a supplemental fee application. The court denies defendants' June 30, 2011 motion for attorney's fees. (Ordered by Chief Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 9/6/2011) (Chief Judge Sidney A Fitzwater) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.