Abramov v. Otis Elevator Co et al
Gena M. Abramov |
Otis Elevator Company and Desert Palace Inc |
3:2011cv00440 |
March 4, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Dallas Office |
Dallas |
Sidney A Fitzwater |
Other Personal Property Damage |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 38 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Desert Palace Inc, Caesars Entertainment Corporation; declining to reach 35 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Desert Palace Inc.; and granting 8 Motion to Transfer filed by Otis Elevator Co. Plaintiff's action against Desert Palace Inc. is dismissed without prejudice by Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) final judgment filed today. Plaintiff's action against Otis Elevator Co. is transferred to the District of Nevada. The clerk of court shall effect the transfer according to the usual procedure. (Ordered by Chief Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 10/25/2011) (Chief Judge Sidney A Fitzwater) |
Filing 46 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER allowing discovery re 38 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Desert Palace Inc. Abramov must complete this discovery and file a supplemental response brief and evidence appendix no later than August 26, 2011. Desert Palace may file a reply brief and evidence appendix no later than 14 days after Abramov files her responsive materials. (Ordered by Chief Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 6/27/2011) (Chief Judge Sidney A Fitzwater) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.