Babatu v. Jackson et al
| Aaron Kobie Sheppard |
| Rebeakh Jackson and VA Medical Center Hospital |
| 3:2011cv00533 |
| March 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| Sam A Lindsay |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
128
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Before the court is Plaintiff's Brief Regarding His Claim Opposing Discharge Under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6), filed 3/13/2015 (Doc. 126 ). The court construes Plaintiff's brief as a motion. Having considered the motion, response, record, and applicable law, Plaintiff's motion is granted in part and denied in part. Specifically, the court grants the motion insofar as Babatu requests that the court enter judgment on the jury's verdict, and denies the motion without prejudice in all other parts. A judgment will issue separately. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 12/31/2015) (bdb)
|
|
Filing
82
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 44 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by VA Medical Center Hospital. Rather than grant DVAMC's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff's privacy claim under the Texas Occupations Code, the c ourt sua sponte dismisses it with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff's claims that remain for trial are those against DVAMC under the Privacy Act and those against Jackson for invasion of privacy by intentional intru sion on seclusion, invasion of privacy by public disclosure of private facts, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The court will reschedule the pretrial conference and the parties' pretrial deadlines by separate order. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 2/18/2014) (tln)
|
|
Filing
67
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 66 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Reply in Support of Motion to Strike or Exclude Evidence Under Seal. Because the Plaintiff's motion for leave and reply brief were filed under seal, the court directs the clerk of the court to maintain these documents under seal. Further, the court denies Plaintiff's 58 Motion to Strike or Exclude Evidence but will permit Plaintiff to depose Scoggins, Chinn, Goldman, and Dr. Dohoney regarding the st atements in their declarations. To provide Plaintiff with sufficient time to take the foregoing depositions, the court vacates the 11/2013 trial setting and all pretrial deadlines, including the pretrial conference set for 10/31/2013. Due to the age of this case, the trial will be rescheduled no later than 3/2014. No further extensions will be granted once the case is reset. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 8/27/2013) (ctf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
