Newmark v. US Postal Service
Plaintiff: Stephen Newmark
Defendant: US Postal Service
Case Number: 3:2011cv00605
Filed: March 24, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Dallas Office
County: Hunt
Presiding Judge: Sam A Lindsay
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 4 Motion to Dismiss filed by US Postal Service. This action is accordingly dismissed without prejudice for want of subject matter jurisdiction. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 6/27/2011) (dnc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Newmark v. US Postal Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: US Postal Service
Represented By: Lynette S Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephen Newmark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?