Unified 2020 Realty Partners, LP v. Proxim Wireless Corp. et al
| Unified 2020 Realty Partners LP |
| Proxim Wireless Corp., Duggan Realty Advisors LLC and Equant Inc |
| 3:2011cv00861 |
| April 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| Sidney A Fitzwater |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 47 Motion to Remand. The action is remanded to the 44th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas. The clerk shall effect the remand in accordance with the usual procedure. (Ordered by Chief Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 3/27/2012) (cea)
|
|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 9 Motion for Discovery, filed by Equant Inc. This discovery must be completed within 45 days of the date this memorandum opinion and order is filed. No later than 60 days after the date this memorandum opinion and order is filed, Equant must file a third amended notice of removal that alleges diversity of citizenship, in conformity with 28 U.S.C. § 1332, by pleading the citizenship of all of Unified 2020's partners; otherwise, this action will be remanded to state court based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Ordered by Chief Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 7/6/2011) (Chief Judge Sidney A Fitzwater)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
