Paskauskiene v. Microconsult Inc
Violeta Paskauskiene |
Microconsult Inc |
3:2011cv01315 |
June 15, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Dallas Office |
Dallas |
A Joe Fish |
Civil Rights: Employment |
42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:61. Mon Jul 30 09:13:24 CDT 2012 (crt) |
Filing 61 AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL granting #60 Motion to Dismiss. The court is of the opinion and finds that all claims between Paskauskiene and Microconsult should be dismissed with prejudice. All costs shall be taxed against the party incurring same. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 7/27/2012) (ykp) |
Filing 60 Joint MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice filed by Microconsult Inc, Violeta Paskauskiene (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Harris, Craig) |
Filing 59 Memorandum Opinion and Order denying #20 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claims Against It for Hostile Work Environment, Retaliation, and Wrongful Discharge. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 7/9/2012) (tln) |
Filing 58 ORDER denying #57 MOTION for Abatement and Stay of Proceedings. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 7/9/2012) (tln) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:59. Mon Jul 9 13:18:04 CDT 2012 (crt) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:58. Mon Jul 9 13:13:10 CDT 2012 (crt) |
Filing 57 MOTION for Abatement and Stay of Proceedings filed by Violeta Paskauskiene. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (cea) |
Filing 56 ORDER granting #55 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer re #53 Counterclaim. Violeta Paskauskiene answer due 7/25/2012. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 6/28/2012) (axm) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:56. Thu Jun 28 11:33:23 CDT 2012 (crt) |
Filing 55 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer to Counterclaim filed by Violeta Paskauskiene. (twd) |
Filing 54 Plaintiff's NOTICE of Written Discovery to Defendant filed by Violeta Paskauskiene. (cea) |
Filing 53 COUNTERCLAIM against Violeta Paskauskiene filed by Microconsult Inc (Harris, Craig) |
Filing 52 ORDER granting #42 Motion for Leave to File Counterclaim. Defendant shall electronically file its counterclaim no later than 5/30/2012. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 5/29/2012) (cea) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:52. Tue May 29 11:07:46 CDT 2012 (crt) |
Filing 51 REPLY filed by Microconsult Inc re: #47 Response/Objection (Attachments: #1 Declaration(s) Exhibit A) (Harris, Craig) |
Filing 50 Notice of Compliance with FRCP Rule 26(A)(1) filed by Violeta Paskauskiene. (ctf) |
Filing 49 ORDER denying #48 Motion to Re-Serve Defendant. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 5/14/2012) (cea) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:49. Mon May 14 15:55:11 CDT 2012 (crt) |
Filing 48 MOTION to Re-Serve Defendant filed by Violeta Paskauskiene. (cea) |
Filing 47 Plaintiff's RESPONSE filed by Violeta Paskauskiene re: #42 MOTION for Leave to File Counterclaim. (cea) |
Filing 46 NOTICE of Compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) filed by Microconsult Inc (Harris, Craig) |
Filing 45 NOTICE of Conflict with Trial Setting on Court's 4-Week Docket Beginning March 4, 2013 re: #44 Scheduling Order,, filed by Microconsult Inc (Harris, Craig) |
Filing 44 ORDER ESTABLISHING SCHEDULE AND CERTAIN PRETRIAL REQUIREMENTS: This case is set for trial on this court's four-week docket beginning 3/4/2013 before Senior Judge A. Joe Fish. Joinder of Parties due by 8/3/2012. Amended Pleadings due by 8/3/2012. Motions due by 9/28/2012. Discovery due by 11/30/2012. Pretrial Order due by 2/22/2013. Pretrial Materials due by 2/22/2013. Pretrial Conference set for 3/1/2013 09:00 AM before Senior Judge A. Joe Fish. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 5/4/2012) (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (axm) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:44. Fri May 4 11:04:04 CDT 2012 (crt) |
Filing 43 Joint STATUS REPORT filed by Microconsult Inc, Violeta Paskauskiene. (Harris, Craig) |
Filing 42 MOTION for Leave to File Counterclaim filed by Microconsult Inc (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Proposed Order) (Harris, Craig) |
Filing 41 ORDER: Plaintiff's #34 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 4/18/2012) (mcrd) |
Filing 40 STATUS REPORT ORDER: Joint Status Report due by 5/3/2012. See order for specifics. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 4/12/2012) (chmb) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:40. Thu Apr 12 11:56:51 CDT 2012 (crt) |
Filing 39 REPLY filed by Violeta Paskauskiene re: #34 MOTION to Appoint Counsel. (twd) |
Filing 38 Request to Withdraw #31 Motion to Strike Defendant's Discovery Requests filed by Violeta Paskauskiene (twd) |
Filing 37 RESPONSE filed by Microconsult Inc re: #31 MOTION to Strike (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 1.1, #3 Exhibit 1.2, #4 Exhibit 1.3, #5 Exhibit 1.4, #6 Exhibit 1.5, #7 Exhibit 2, #8 Exhibit 3) (Harris, Craig) |
Filing 36 RESPONSE filed by Microconsult Inc re: #34 MOTION to Appoint Counsel (Harris, Craig) |
Filing 35 ORDER OF REFERENCE referring #34 Motion to Appoint Counsel to the United States Magistrate Judge Rene Harris Toliver for a hearing, if necessary, and for determination. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 3/19/2012) (ykp) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:35. Mon Mar 19 13:43:26 CDT 2012 (crt) |
Filing 34 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Violeta Paskauskiene. (ctf) |
Filing 33 AFFIDAVIT in support of #31 MOTION to Strike by Violeta Paskauskiene. (twd) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:32. Wed Mar 7 14:10:59 CST 2012 (crt) |
Filing 32 ORDER OF REFERENCE REFERRING #31 MOTION to Unfile the Answers to Defendant's Discovery Requests to Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 3/6/2012) (tln) |
Filing 31 MOTION to Unfile the Answers to Defendant's Discovery Requests filed by Violeta Paskauskiene. (ykp) |
Filing 30 NOTICE re: #25 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney filed by Violeta Paskauskiene (McBeth, Hiram) |
Filing 29 NOTICE re: #25 MOTION and #28 Order Granting Motion to Withdraw as Attorney filed by Violeta Paskauskiene (McBeth, Hiram) Modified on 2/29/2012 to add linkage to order(dsr). |
Filing 28 ORDER granting #25 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney on the condition that Hiram McBeth send a copy of this order to plaintiff and file a copy of the transmittal letter for this order with the court. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 2/27/2012) (ykp) |
Filing 27 RESPONSE AND OBJECTION filed by Microconsult Inc re: #25 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney (Harris, Craig) |
Filing 26 RESPONSE filed by Violeta Paskauskiene re: #25 Hiram McBeth's MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney. (skt) |
Filing 25 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney filed by Violeta Paskauskiene with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (McBeth, Hiram) |
Filing 24 REPLY filed by Microconsult Inc re: #20 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Hostile Work Environment, Retaliation and Wrongful Discharge Claims for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted (Harris, Craig) |
Filing 23 RESPONSE filed by Violeta Paskauskiene re: #20 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Hostile Work Environment, Retaliation and Wrongful Discharge Claims for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted (McBeth, Hiram) |
Filing 22 ANSWER to #16 Amended Complaint filed by Microconsult Inc Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas should seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. (Harris, Craig) |
Filing 21 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Microconsult Inc re #20 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Hostile Work Environment, Retaliation and Wrongful Discharge Claims for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted (Harris, Craig) |
Filing 20 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Hostile Work Environment, Retaliation and Wrongful Discharge Claims for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted filed by Microconsult Inc (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order Granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss) (Harris, Craig) |
Filing 19 ORDER denying as moot #9 Motion for More Definite Statement; denying as moot #10 Motion to Dismiss. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 9/27/2011) (ndt) |
Filing 18 RESPONSE filed by Violeta Paskauskiene re: #10 MOTION to Dismiss Certain Claims in Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (McBeth, Hiram) |
Filing 17 RESPONSE filed by Violeta Paskauskiene re: #9 MOTION for More Definite Statement (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (McBeth, Hiram) |
Filing 16 AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND Second Amended Complaint against Microconsult Inc filed by Violeta Paskauskiene. (McBeth, Hiram) |
Filing 15 ORDER granting #14 Motion for Leave to File. Amended Pleadings due by 9/23/2011. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 9/21/2011) (dnc) |
Filing 14 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint filed by Violeta Paskauskiene (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Proposed Order) (McBeth, Hiram) |
Filing 13 Order Unfiling #8 Amended Complaint filed by Violeta Paskauskiene due to the following deficiency: No leave of court was filed to file a second amended complaint. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 9/19/2011) (mfw) |
Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Microconsult Inc. (Harris, Craig) |
Filing 11 Defendant's Original ANSWER to #5 Amended Complaint filed by Microconsult Inc Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas should seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. (Harris, Craig) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss Certain Claims in Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted filed by Microconsult Inc with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Brief in Support, #2 Exhibit(s) Proposed Order) (Harris, Craig) |
Filing 9 MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by Microconsult Inc (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Proposed Order) (Harris, Craig) |
Filing 8 ***UNFILED PER #13 ORDER***AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Violeta Paskauskiene. (McBeth, Hiram) Modified on 9/20/2011 (dnc). |
Filing 7 Additional attachment to main document #6 (Harris, Craig) (Modified on 9/19/2011 following clarification that the document is intended to be an attachment to #6, not a pending motion) lrl. |
Filing 6 Copy of parties' agreement regarding plaintiff's filing of amended complaint and deadline for defendant to file responsive pleading. (The court has advised the parties by phone a motion is required.) (Harris, Craig) Modified text on 9/19/2011 (lrl). |
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Violeta Paskauskiene. (McBeth, Hiram) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Microconsult Inc. (axm) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Magistrate Judge Toliver preliminarily assigned. File to Judge Fish. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (axm) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Violeta Paskauskiene. (McBeth, Hiram) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Violeta Paskauskiene. Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the #Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. (Filing fee $350; Receipt number 0539-3943069) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas should seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (McBeth, Hiram) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Paskauskiene v. Microconsult Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Violeta Paskauskiene | |
Represented By: | Hiram McBeth, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Microconsult Inc | |
Represented By: | Craig A Harris |
Represented By: | Christine M Powers |
Represented By: | David S Henry, II |
Represented By: | Nicole L Hay |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.