Blank v. Eavenson et al
| Travis Blank |
| Harold Eavenson, Bob Guzik, Linda Bell, Les Sandknop and NFN Tubera |
| 3:2011cv01327 |
| June 17, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Collin |
| Ed Kinkeade |
| Renee Harris Toliver |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
136
ORDER ACCEPTING 129 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 9/10/2014) (tln)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Defendant Bells 41 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. The case is re-referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge Toliver for pretrial management. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 9/20/2012) (aaa)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER ACCEPTING 24 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The motions 16 to dismiss of Defendants Sandknop, Eavenson, and Guzik are GRANTED, and the complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to those Defendants. Defendan t Sandknop's 6 alternative motion for a more definite statement is DENIED AS MOOT. Defendant Bell's motion to dismiss is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This case is re-referred to U.S. Magistrate Renee Harris Toliver for further pretrial management. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 3/1/2012) (ykp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
