Rodriguez v. Italy Police Department et al
| Guillermo Rodriguez |
| Mike Adams, Kent McGuire and Chris Bentley |
| 3:2011cv01721 |
| July 19, 2011 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| A. Joe Fish |
| Irma C Ramirez |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
ORDER ACCEPTING 48 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 37 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Chris Bentley, Mike Adams. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, Filed 8/3/2012 is Granted in Part. Plaintiff's Claims Against Defendants Chris Bentley and Mike Adams are Dismissed with Prejudice Until He Satisfies the Conditions Set Forth in Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 3/22/2013) (cea)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER Accepting 10 Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge: Defendant Bentley's 18 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Defendant Adams' 23 Motion to Dismiss are DENIED. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 7/27/2012) (axm)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER ACCEPTING 10 Findings and Recommendations, re: 10 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 2 Complaint, filed by Guillermo Rodriguez. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 11/14/2011) (ctf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
