Zimmerman v. Gruma Corporation

Zimmerman v. Gruma Corporation

Plaintiff:	Carolyn Ruth Zimmerman
Defendant:	Gruma Corporation
Case Number:	3:2011cv01990
Filed:	August 10, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office:	Dallas Office
County:	Dallas
Presiding Judge:	Sam A Lindsay
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 21, 2013	Filing 26 Memorandum Opinion and Order: The court sustains in part and overrules in part Defendant's Objections to and 19 Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Summary Judgment Evidence. With respect to the statements mentioned in paragraphs 14, 18, 19, 20, and 26 of Plaintiff's affidavit, and the personnel records in pages 12-75 of Plaintiff's Appendix, the court strikes these statements and documents from the record. With respect to Plaintiff's statement in paragraph 27, the cou rt denies Defendant's request to strike them from the record. The court further determines that no genuine dispute of material fact exists regarding Plaintiff's claims for age discrimination under the ADEA; disability discrimination unde r the ADA; or retaliation under the ADEA or the ADA. Accordingly, Gruma is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on these claims; the court grants Defendant's 16 Motion for Summary Judgment and dismisses with prejudice this action. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 6/21/2013) (twd)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 21, 2013

Filing 26 Memorandum Opinion and Order: The court sustains in part and overrules in part Defendant's Objections to and 19 Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Summary Judgment Evidence. With respect to the statements mentioned in paragraphs 14, 18, 19, 20, and 26 of Plaintiff's affidavit, and the personnel records in pages 12-75 of Plaintiff's Appendix, the court strikes these statements and documents from the record. With respect to Plaintiff's statement in paragraph 27, the cou rt denies Defendant's request to strike them from the record. The court further determines that no genuine dispute of material fact exists regarding Plaintiff's claims for age discrimination under the ADEA; disability discrimination unde r the ADA; or retaliation under the ADEA or the ADA. Accordingly, Gruma is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on these claims; the court grants Defendant's 16 Motion for Summary Judgment and dismisses with prejudice this action. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 6/21/2013) (twd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zimmerman v. Gruma Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Gruma Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carolyn Ruth Zimmerman
Represented By:	John E Wall, Jr
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?