Stoneeagle Services Inc v. Gillman et al
Plaintiff: Stoneeagle Services Inc
Defendant: David Gillman and Talon Transaction Technologies Inc
Case Number: 3:2011cv02408
Filed: September 16, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Dallas Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: Jorge A Solis
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 388 Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 342 Motion for Protective Order filed by Talon Transaction Technologies Inc. (See order for specifics) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L Horan on 11/13/2013) (mcrd)
February 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 246 ORDER denying 42 Motion for Order to Show Cause; granting 50 Motion for Clarification of the Preliminary Injunction; denying 96 Motion to Partially Dismiss the Second Amended Answer and Counterclaims; Partially adopting 144 Findings and Recommendations and granting 146 Motion for Summary Judgment. Also granting 176 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Objections; granting 190 Motion to Strike; denying 190 Motion for Leave to File. Plaintiff to provide a bond in the amount of $100,000.00 for clarified preliminary injunction. Court GRANTS Motion to Dismiss 8 Original Complaint in case no 3:12-cv-4397. (Ordered by Judge Jorge A Solis on 2/19/2013) (chmb)
August 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 173 ORDER: Objections to Magistrate's Findings & Recommendations overruled and Findings and Recommendations accepted. Accordingly the Court denies 96 the Motion to Dismiss. (Ordered by Judge Jorge A Solis on 8/22/2012) (chmb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stoneeagle Services Inc v. Gillman et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stoneeagle Services Inc
Represented By: Beverly A Whitley
Represented By: Christopher B Trowbridge
Represented By: Craig Joseph Cox
Represented By: Ross Angus Williams
Represented By: Donnie Wilson Wisenbaker, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Gillman
Represented By: Lauren Julia Brown
Represented By: Ruben C DeLeon
Represented By: Clark Anthony Donat
Represented By: Paul Flannigan
Represented By: Catherine Hough
Represented By: Michael D Pegues
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Talon Transaction Technologies Inc
Represented By: Lauren Julia Brown
Represented By: Ruben C DeLeon
Represented By: Clark Anthony Donat
Represented By: Paul Flannigan
Represented By: Catherine Hough
Represented By: Michael D Pegues
Represented By: Lauren Julia Brown
Represented By: Ruben C DeLeon
Represented By: Clark Anthony Donat
Represented By: Paul Flannigan
Represented By: Catherine Hough
Represented By: Michael D Pegues
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?