Baylor Health Care System et al v. Equitable Plan Services Inc
Plaintiff: |
Baylor Health Care System, Baylor University Medical Center and The Heart Hospital Baylor Plano |
Defendant: |
Equitable Plan Services Inc |
Case Number: |
3:2011cv03023 |
Filed: |
November 3, 2011 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Office: |
Dallas Office |
County: |
Dallas |
Presiding Judge: |
Sam A Lindsay |
Presiding Judge: |
Renee Harris Toliver |
Nature of Suit: |
Other Contract |
Cause of Action: |
09 U.S.C. ยง 0010 |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
July 5, 2013 |
Filing
34
Amended Memorandum Opinion and Order: The court grants 30 Baylor's Motion to Reconsider, vacates its 3/15/2012 memorandum opinion and order, and issues this amended memorandum opinion and order in its place. The court's determination in this regard, however, does not affect the outcome of this case or the court's prior determination that arbitration award should be affirmed. The court therefore accepts in part and rejects in part the 25 findings and conclusions of the m agistrate judge as herein set forth. Accordingly, Baylor's objections are overruled; Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award (Doc. 2 ) is denied; Defendant's Cross-Application to Confirm Arbitration Award (Doc. 15 ) is granted; and Defendant's Motion to Unseal the Record (Doc. 14 ) is denied as moot. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 7/5/2013) (axm)
|
March 15, 2012 |
Filing
28
Memorandum Opinion and Order accepting 25 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (except to the extent modified in this memorandum opinion and order); denying 2 Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award; grantin g 15 Cross-Application to Confirm Arbitration Award; denying as moot 14 Motion to Unseal the Record. Defendant EPS shall file a supplemental brief not to exceed 5 pages by 3/23/2012. Likewise, Plaintiff Baylor may file a brief stating whether Defendant EPS is entitled to prejudgment interest and its applicability to this case. Such brief shall not exceed 5 pages and must be filed by 3/23/2012. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 3/15/2012) (twd)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?