Dingler v. Equifax et al
Plaintiff: Joseph Dingler
Defendant: Equifax, Experian, Transunion and Federal Trade Commission
Case Number: 3:2012cv00455
Filed: February 13, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Dallas Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: Barbara M.G. Lynn
Presiding Judge: Paul D Stickney
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER ACCEPTING 72 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' 52 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and Plaintiff's 63 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Plaintiff's 68 Motion for Reconsideration of the Magistrates Discovery Order is DENIED as moot. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 3/31/2014) (tln)
September 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER: Plaintiff's Fair Credit Reporting Act claims against Defendants Experian, Equifax and Transunion shall proceed and process shall be issued as to these Defendants; Plaintiff's remaining claims are dismissed with prejudice; The Clerk of the Court shall issue summons and refer this case to Magistrate Judge Stickney for further proceedings. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 9/5/2012) (cea)
July 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER ACCEPTING 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 3 Complaint filed by Joseph Dingler. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 7/5/2012) (cea)
May 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER. On April 27, 2012, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint. The Court therefore VACATES its April 11, 2012, Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation. On April 27, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of counsel. The Court therefore denies the motion as premature. (see order) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Paul D Stickney on 5/21/2012) (mcrd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dingler v. Equifax et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Dingler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Equifax
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Experian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Transunion
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Trade Commission
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?