Boulle, LTD. v. De Boulle Jewelry & Diamonds, Inc.
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|August 25, 2015
Memorandum Opinion and Order. The court grants in part and denies in part 279 Plaintiffs Motion for Entry of Judgment and denies 280 De Boulles Motion for a Finding that this is an Exceptional Case. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 8/25/2015) (ndt)
|August 29, 2014
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Having reviewed the pleadings, file, and record in this case, and the 154 findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge, the court determines that the magistrate judge's findings and conclusions are correct, an d accepts them as those of the court. For the reasons stated herein, the court (1) denies Plaintiff and Third-Party Defendant's 147 Motion for Summary Judgment on Defendant's counterclaims and third-party claims; (2) grants Defendant' ;s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment on all of Plaintiff's claims and causes of action; and (3) denies Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment on its own counterclaims and third-party claims. Plaintiff Boulle Ltd.'s claims against Defe ndant are dismissed with prejudice. Defendant's counterclaims and third-party claims of trademark infringement, unfair competition, misappropriation, and state-law dilution will proceed to trial. Further, the court grants Defendant's 167 Motion to Realign the Parties. The court therefore directs the clerk of the court to change the caption of this action to reflect this realignment. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 8/29/2014) (ctf)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?