McCollum et al v. Livingston et al
| Stephen McCollum, Stephanie Kingrey and Sandra McCollum |
| Brad Livingston, Jeff Pringle and Texas Department of Criminal Justice |
| 3:2012cv02037 |
| June 26, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| Sam A Lindsay |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
118
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Having determined that good cause exists, the court, pursuant to Rule 15(a), allows Plaintiffs to file an amended pleading in the interest of justice. Plaintiffs shall file a second amended complaint by 1/31/2014. As this is the second amended pleading, and in light of the age of this case, the court will allow no further amendment of Plaintiffs' pleadings. In light of the court's ruling, Defendant UTMB is permitted to file an amended motion pursua nt to Rule 12(c) by 2/7/2014. Likewise, Defendant Brad Livingston is permitted to file a second amended motion to dismiss on the basis of qualified immunity by 2/7/2014. Accordingly, the court denies as moot Defendant UTMB's 55 Motion to Dismiss Under FRCP 12(c), filed 5/30/2013; and also denies as moot Defendant Brad Livingston's 97 Amended Motion to Dismiss on the Basis of Qualified Immunity, filed 10/25/2013. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 1/28/2014) (tln)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
